Speech communication in terms of cognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34nS3.1000Keywords:
language sign, communication, cognitive linguistics, biocognitive science, meaning, conceptAbstract
The paper presents various approaches to defining the essence of a sign in cognitive science and philosophy of language. It offers presentations of critical review of research publications on sign processes. Based on extensive theoretical work in a cognitive approach to communication process, the hypothesis that each speaker of a language acts exclusively within the framework of their cognitive area is supported in the article. Given the results, meaning as a fact of consciousness is closed in it and during the “translation” of meanings they are not transmitted: signs cannot be considered to be carriers of meanings in the sense that meanings making up a part of their material body are contained in them. The material components of signs stimulate the appearance of identical or similar meanings, actuating analogous conceptual spheres in communicating minds.
Downloads
References
Clopper, C. G., Turnbull, R., Cangemi, F., Clayards, M., Niebuhr, O., Schuppler, B., & Zellers, M. (2018). Exploring variation in phonetic reduction: Linguistic, social, and cognitive factors. Rethinking reduction, 25-72.
Collins, L., & Jisum, C. (2019). The role of linguistics studies on the political debate. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 48-59.
Colston, H. L. (2021). Cognitive Linguistics and Figurative Language. In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 408-420). Routledge.
Gensini, S. (2020). Aspects of the ongoing debate on animal communication.(Zoo) semiotics and cognitive ethology. In The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity (pp. 199-216). Springer, Cham.
Kravchenko, A. (2022). Review of Koshelev (2020): On the Genesis of Thought and Language: The Emergence of Concepts and Propositions. The Nature and Structure of Human Category. On the Impact of Culture on Thought and Language. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 9(1), 158-164.
Kravchenko, A. V. (2020). Linguistic semiosis and human cognition. Constructivist Foundations, 15(3), 285-287.
Luz, S., Haider, F., de la Fuente, S., Fromm, D., & MacWhinney, B. (2021). Detecting cognitive decline using speech only: The ADReSSo Challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09356.
Pesina, S. A., Antropova, L. I., Yusupova, L. G., Zalavina, T. Y., Pustovoitova, O. V., & Terenteva, N. G. (2021). Research of communication as a sign process at the semantic and biocognitive levels. Review of judicial practice. Universidad y sociedad, 13(6), 83-88.
Pika, S., Wilkinson, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Vernes, S. C. (2018). Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285(1880), 20180598.
Prihodko, G., & Galaidin, A. (2018). Prospects of cognitive and ecological linguistics. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 29(4), 121-127.
Sardone, R., Battista, P., Panza, F., Lozupone, M., Griseta, C., Castellana, F., ... & Quaranta, N. (2019). The age-related central auditory processing disorder: silent impairment of the cognitive ear. Frontiers in neuroscience, 619.
Savrievna, Z. N. (2022). The Concept of Discourse as A Cognitive Phenomenon of Translation. Eurasian Research Bulletin, 7, 207-211.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
