Obligatory of jurisprudence in Mexico and the control of conventionalityOF JURISPRUDENCE IN MEXICO AND THE CONTROL OF CONVENTIONALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol33nS2.616Keywords:
Conventionality, unconventionality, human rights, legal interpretationAbstract
A legal system cannot be conceived without transformations; Globalization, technological and educational progress have influenced the way of imparting and administering justice, which until a few decades ago seemed static, is susceptible to various interpretations, generating the inclusion or recognition of new rights in search of the broadest protection to the person. When talking about the evolution of the legal system in Mexico, it is mandatory to refer to the conventionality control and the obligatory nature of the jurisprudence, two tools that contribute to the jurisdictional work, but that generate dilemmas in the judges in cases where the jurisprudence is contrary. to conventional legal systems, since dilemmas arise such as the mandatory application of jurisprudence that contravenes rights enshrined in international instruments or to disengage before the duty of the judges to apply the conventionality control.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.