Narrative ecotopics in English biblical discourse: A study of the Old and New Testaments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34n1.725Keywords:
biblical discourse, ecological component, discourse-forming biblical concepts, ecodescriptor, narration, narrative ecotopicAbstract
Objective: This paper addresses the Old and New Testaments viewed from the econarrative perspective in environmental and social contexts.
Method: The method applied combines the techniques of conceptual, semantic, thematic, and narrative analyses in the authors' original interpretation.
Results and discussion: It examines biblical narrations via four discourse-forming concepts – GOD, NATURE, MAN, and SOCIETY, various combinations of which shape a set of narrative ecotopics focused on the concept of MAN. Such ecotopics as "Man and nature in their interaction", "Man and family relations", "Man in society", "Man's path to God" reveal the relationships between man, nature, God, family, and society as well as man's responsibility before God. Their ecological component is marked by verbocentric ecodescriptors actualized in narrative schemes.
Material: This study zeroes in on the narrative ecotopic "Man's path to God" with its subtopic "the way through sacrifice", presented in the stories of Abraham in Genesis and Hannah in 1 Samuel from the Old Testament as compared to the story of Jesus in 1 Peter, 1 John, and the Gospel of John from the New Testament.
Conclusions: In the Old Testament the path to God through sacrifice in ecologically charged narrations reflects the readiness of man to sacrifice his/her most valuable thing to prove their faithfulness and faith. In the New Testament Jesus' sacrifice involves the whole humankind, thanks to His sufferings for their sinless life.
Downloads
References
Alefirenko, N. F. (2010). Concept – notion – category in the light of modern linguocognitive science. Nauchnyye vedomosti, v. 7, 18(89): 5–12.
Alifanova, O. G. (2010). Cognitive and discursive potential of a narrative (the narrative of the Holy Scriptures). PhD dissertation, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk.
Alter, R. (2011/1980). The Art of biblical narrative. New York: Basic Books.
Babyre, O. V. (2011). Stylistic devices as argumentative techniques in English ecological discourse (documentary films). Linhvistyka ХХІ stolittia: novi doslidzhennia i perspektyvy: 51–56.
Bauckham, R. (2010). The Bible and ecology: Rediscovering the community of creation. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.
Berlin, A. (1994). Poetics and interpretation of biblical narrative. Winona Lake, Indiana: EISENBRAUNS.
Bernstein, E. (2005). The splendor of creation: А biblical ecology. Cleveland, Ohio: The Pilgrim Press.
Boldyrev, N. N. (2016). Functional categorization of the English verb. Moscow / Berlin: Direkt-Media.
Boldyrev, N. N., Alpatov, V. V. (2008). A cognitive-matrix analysis of English christian place-names. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, v. 4: 5–14.
Bolotnova, N.S. (2009). Philological analysis of the text. Moscow: Izd-vo Flinta; Izd-vo Nauka.
Bondarenko, E. V. (2014). Matrix Modeling. The duality of time in the English-language picture of the world. Kharkov: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina.
Bredin, M. (2010). The ecology of the New Testament: Creation, re-creation, and the environment. Colorado Springs, CO: Biblica Publishing.
Cambridge English Online Dictionary. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/
Cooper, A. M. (1976). Biblical poetics: A linguistic approach. PhD dissertation, Yale University, Connecticut.
Funk, R. W. (1988). The poetics оf biblical narrative. Sonoma: Polebridge Press.
Ionova, S. V. (2011). On ecologicity signs of textual communication. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, v. 2, 1(13): 190–197.
Іzotova, N. P. (2009). Textual concept WAY TO GLORY in English biographical novels of the XX century: semantic-cognitive and narrative aspects. PhD dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv.
Jindo, J. Y. (2009). Toward a poetics of the biblical mind: Language, culture, and cognition. Vetus Testamentum, 59(2): 222–243. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/953460/Toward_a_Poetics_of_the_Biblical_Mind_Language_Culture_and_Cognition
Khribar, S. F. (2003). Ecology in the Bible. Forms of religious and ecological worldview. Kyiv: Kiyevskiy ekologo-kulturnyy tsentr. Available from: http://www.ecoethics.ru/old/b46/
Kolesnyk, O. S. (2013). Linguo-cultural dimension of mythological semiosis. Visnyk Luhanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Ch. 1, 9(268): 239–246,.
Kostyushkina, G. M. (2005). Modern trends in French linguistics. Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGUEP.
Kravchenko, N. K. (2018). Ecopragmatics as a new field of research in modern linguistics. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, v. 1, 34: 98–101.
Kravchenko, N., Pasternak, T., Davydova, T. (2020). Eco-pragmatics: the state of the art. Cogito, v. XII, 3: 281–296.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leshchenko, A. V. (2017). Narrative tension of a literary text. Cherkassy: ChP Gordiyenko.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (2009). Longman: Pearson Education.
Louder, D. K. (2005). Marks’s poem of the passion (15: 16–26): А study in poetics and biblical interpretation. PhD dissertation, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton.
McKinion, R. L. (2006). An analysis of a compositional approach to biblical narrative (Genesis 37). PhD dissertation, Southeasten Baptist Theological Seminary, Wake Forest.
Nazarov, K. V. (2015). The problem of focalization of the Old Testament narrative. Narratorium, 1(8). Available from: http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2634325
Nikonova, V.G. (2008). The conceptual space of the tragic in Shakespeare’s plays: poetic-cognitive analysis. DrSc dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv.
Orekhova, N. N., Shitikov, P. M. (2013). Conceptual metaphors in the Gospel of John. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 2(035): 122–125.
Pankov, G. D. (2010). Christian anthropology of sacrifice: The evangelical ideal and modern realities. Znamenskiye chteniya. Available from: http://studydoc.ru/doc/2161798/pankov-g.d.--hristianskaya-antropologiya
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Rudelev, V. G. (2012). The problems of ecology in modern Russian language. Tasks and difficulties of their decision. Ecology of language and speech: 15–18.
Rudenko, N. (2010). Ecological linguistic concepts in poetic discourse: translation aspect. Naukovyi Visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu, v. Х: 65–68.
Shakhovskiy, V. I., Solodovnikova, N. G. (2013). Greening modern science and parameters of ecological communication. In: Shakhovskiy, V.I. (Ed.). Emotive linguoecology in the modern communicative space. Volgograd: Izd-vo VSGPU “Peremena”.
Shamne, N. L., Karyanin, A. V. (2011). Verbal aggression as the violation of ecologicity in the political discourse. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1(13): 204–208.
Sternberg, M. (1988). The poetics of biblical narrative. Ideological literature and the drama of reading. Bloomingston, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
The Holy Bible. King James Version. (1991). New York: Ivy Books.
Usborne Illustrated Dictionary and Thesaurus. (2007). London: Usborne Publishing Ltd.
Vorobyоva, O. P. (1993). Text categories and factor of addressee. Kiev: Vishcha shkola.
Weiss, A. L. (2006). Figurative language in biblical prose narrative: Metaphor in the Book of Samuel. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Wright, C. J. H. (1983). An eye for an eye: Тhe place of Old Testament ethics today. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press.
Zebre, G. (1992). Ecology according to the New Testament. Direction, 21(2). Available from: http://www.directionjournal.org/21/2/ecology-according-to-new-testament.html
Zhabotinskaya, S. A. (2009). Concept / Domain: Matrix and network models. Kultura narodov Prichernomoria, v. 1, 168: 254–259.
Zhykharieva, O. O. (2018). Conceptual ecotopics in English biblical ecodiscourse. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho linhvistychnoho universytetu, v. 21(1): 112–120.
Zolotova, G. A. (1982). Communicative aspects of Russian syntax.Moscow: Izd-vo Nauka.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
