Repercussions of institutional change in Mexican fiscal federalism in the years 2000, 2012 and 2018: a comparative study between the states of Méxi-co, Guanajuato and Tabasco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34n2.883Keywords:
fiscal federalism, centralization of resources, institutionalism, comparativism, institutional changeAbstract
The proposal developed in this paper suggests an inclination towards addressing institutional change, since special emphasis is placed on how institutions have impacted the development of Mexican fiscal federalism, in particular of three states that, due to their fiscal situation, make it possible, comparatively, establish a timely diagnosis of its inherent factors, in order to explain its processes and future horizons. For this reason, the general objective of the work is to identify the increase or decrease of federal transfers to the entities of the State of Mexico, Guanajuato and Tabasco, the comparative method is proposed for the search of empirical references. The results obtained reflect that there is an influence of partisan alignment regarding the distribution of resources, particularly from Branch 33. Among the most important findings derived from the study is that in relation to the resources transferred, in Branch 33, there is constantly in the last eight years an overexercise. However, the state that overexerts these resources with the greatest presence in the period between 2012 and 2018 is the state of Tabasco, with data that averages 7 percent per year.
Downloads
References
Ávila, C. e Hinojosa, R. (2011). Federalismo fiscal mexicano: Los conflictos de la democracia participativa. En cofactor. Recuperado de: http://cofactor.edomex.gob.mx/sites/cofactor.edomex.gob.mx/files/files/cofactor%204/cofactor_4_pdf_5.pdf 2 (4) 141-191
Barragán, J. (2007). El federalismo mexicano. Visión histórico constitucional. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas
Díaz, M. (2002). “Federalismo fiscal y asignación de competencias: una perspectiva teórica”. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, III(11), .[fecha de Consulta 18 de Abril de 2021]. ISSN: 1405-8421. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=11101102.
Lijphart, A. (2008). Política comparada y método comparado. En Mantilla, S. y Cisneros, F. Revista Latinoamericana de Política Comparada. (1) Ecuador: Centro Latinoamericano de Estudios Políticos. Recuperado de: http://politicacomparada.com/ediciones_anteriores/Vol%201,%20Revista%20Lat.%20de%20Politica%20Comparada.pdf.
Rovira, E. (1986). Federalismo y cooperación en la República Federal de Alemania. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Sánchez, S. (2020). “Análisis del presupuesto aprobado y del gasto ejercido, 2001-2017. El caso del Ramo 33”. región y sociedad, 32, e1270. DOI: 10.22198/rys2020/32/1270.
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. (2020a). Presupuesto de Egresos de la Federación 2020 Estrategia Programática. Ramo 28. Participaciones a Entidades Federativas y Municipios. Recuperado de: https://www.ppef.hacienda.gob.mx/work/models/PPEF2020/docs/02/r02_ep.pdf.
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. (2020b). Resumen ejecutivo de la consultoría para realizar evaluaciones del ramo 33. México: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, A.C
Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia
Tello, C. (2006). Ciclo de conferencias Derecho y economía. México: UNAM
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.