Procedural and legal regime of legal activity: nature, essence, purpose
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34nS2.948Keywords:
actividad jurídica, forma procesal, régimen jurídico, régimen procesal y jurídico, proceso jurídicoAbstract
This article attempts to consider a number of controversial issues regarding the definition of the nature, essence (including the concept and signs) and the purpose of the procedural legal regime in the theory of procedural legal regulation. The procedural and legal regime, as an element of the procedural-legal form, unfortunately, has not received sufficient development in legal science; a gap, in particular, remains the issues of establishing the characteristics of the category under consideration, without which it is impossible to establish the nature, essence and purpose of the procedural and legal regime. This remark is also true in relation to the definition of the concept of a procedural and legal regime, since the approaches available in legal science, for the most part, do not reveal the features and unique legal nature of the category under study. The authors of the article, on the basis of establishing the essential features of the procedural and legal regime, proposed its authentic definition, as based on a certain combination of procedural and legal means and principles of a special procedure for procedural and legal regulation of activities of subjects and participants in the legal process, aimed at legal and reasonable consideration and resolution of legal cases.
Downloads
References
Baranova, M. V., Kuptsova, O. B., Belyasov, S. N., & Valentonis, A. S. (2021). Culture of legal techniques: key dominants in the modern Russian legal system. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(71).
Belyaeva, G. S., Katomina, V. A., Kutina, V. P., Khabiyeva, Z. D., & Podolskiy, A. V. (2020). Legal regime and stages of procedural regulation: essence and content. 3,17-23.
Belyaev, V. P., Belyaeva, G. S., Turanin, V. Y., Nincieva, T. M., & Avdeeva, N. S. (2020). On the Issue of the Effectiveness of Legal Regulation Based on Psychological Aspects. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 8(2), e509.
Belyaeva, G. S., Makogon, B. V., Savelyeva, R. V., Tonkov, E. E., & Dolzhenko, N. I. (2019). Security of the state power limits: limit system. Religación: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(13), 174-180.
Dyachenko, O. G. V., Kuksin, I. N., Makogon, B. V., Spektor, L. A., & Vladimirova, O. V. (2018). Restrictive-regulatory potential of procedural standard. 5(14), 830-836.
Galetta, D. U. (2010). Procedural autonomy of EU Member States: paradise lost?: a study on the" functionalized procedural competence" of EU Member States. Springer Science & Business Media.
Grebnev, I. (2021, November). Regional Strategic Planning of hunting Nature Management: Political and Legal Aspects of Ensuring Sustainable Development. In Second Conference on Sustainable Development: Industrial Future of Territories (IFT 2021) (pp. 384-387). Atlantis Press.
Kutko, V. V., Makogon, B. V., Shishkin, A. A., Vasekina, E. M., & Goryachkovskaya, Y. M. (2018). Procedural law development stages. 226-230.
Makogon, B. V., Savel’eva, I. V., Lyahkova, A. I., Parshina, A. A., & Emel’anov, A. S. (2017). Interpretation of legal responsibility as a universal instrument of procedural legal restrictions. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7(S-APRLSPCL), 328.
Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Minasyan, A. A., Nincieva, T. M., & Novikova, A. E. (2019). Legal form of action: the issues of content and methodology.Vol. 6(2), 402-409.
Makogon, B. V., Nikulin, M. I., Samsonov, V. N., Sorokoletova, M. A., & Tovstukha, O. O. (2017). Objectives and Principles of Administrative Proceedings: Doctrinal Ideas and Legislative Wordings of the Eastern European Countries. J. Pol. & L., 10, 221.
Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Minasyan, A. A., Novikova, A. E., & Yarychev, N. U. (2019). Logical classification of legal procedural restrictions. 6, 395-401.
Scheffer, T. (2007). File work, legal care, and professional habitus—an ethnographic reflection on different styles of advocacy. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 14(1), 57-80.
Turanin, V. Y., Pozharova, L. A., Kurilenko, N. N., Rumyantsev, M. B., & Krikun, V. G. (2019). Systematization of legal terms in regional lawmaking. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valore, 6(Special).
Zhukova, N. A., Kislitsyna, I. N., Mamin, S. N., Abbasov, N. I., & Aghajanian, A. V. (2019). Problems of procedural rights abuse. 3, 1149-1152.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
